School Reform Policy in Newfoundland and Labrador in the 1990s: AN Analysis of Potential Impacts on Conditions for Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the 1990s, the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador enacted education reform legislation. As with school reform in general, these statutes sought to establish principles for restructuring and conditions for improving learning for every child in the province. However, research indicates that many reform strategies fail to improve student achievement significantly, if at all (Newmann & Wehlage, 1995). This study examined the potential of the province’s laws for improving the quality of teaching and learning. Specific questions were: 1) how frequent and in what patterns are instructional components and enabling strategies embedded in education statutes and regulations? 2) are these instruments organized according to essential elements of policy to improve the quality of teaching and learning? 3) what do the frequency, pattern and level of policy support of instructional components embedded in the legislation mean for the likelihood of improving teaching and learning? These questions were addressed by using the literature to design and structure a content analysis of the current legislation to surface the patterns of instructional components and enabling strategies that positively affect teaching and learning and key elements of policy that are critical for implementation. The components and strategies were: content standards, student assessments, professional development, policy alignment, curricular materials, accountability and restructured governance. The policy elements were: goals, financial resources, supporting rules and implementation structures. The study found that instructional components were not embedded in legislation in a way that would improve achievement in schools. The statutory language focused mostly on governance. Moreover, instructional components were implicitly expressed and embedded in the duties of local administrators or school councils. Schools and boards were left with the responsibility of improving the quality of student learning but with few supporting rules and no direct financial support or implementation structures. Under such circumstances, it is unlikely that student achievement will improve. These findings will expose ways that statutes in education can and cannot be designed to affect policy implementation at the local level, help provincial policymakers reflect on the goals and potential impact of reform, and establish new directions that can help the province to improve student achievement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".