Efficient Implementation of Anchored 2-core Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Often graph theory is used to model and analyze different behaviors of networks including social networks. Nowadays, social networks have become very popular and social network providers try to expand their networks by encouraging people to stay engaged and active. Studies show that engagement and activities of people in social networks influence engagement of their connections. This behavior has been modeled by the k-core problem in graph theory with the assumption that a person stays active in the network if he or she has k or more connections. In the above model if a person drops out, his or her friends can become discouraged and they might also drop out. An approach called anchored k-core algorithm has been introduced lately that prevents a cascade of drop-outs by finding nodes which have the most influence on their connections and rewarding them to stay in the network. In this work, an efficient implementation of the anchored 2-core approach has been proposed. The proposed implementation method was applied to a set of real world network data that includes very large graphs with millions of links. The results show that with only a few anchors, it is possible to save hundreds of nodes for the 2-core graph. Also, the execution time of our implementation is in order of minutes for huge datasets which proves the efficiency of our implementation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".