Bibliographic record
Abstract
La 6e confrence internationale de gographie critique s'est droule Francfort du 16 au 20 aot 2011. Pendant quatre jours, environ trois cents participants venus de nombreux pays se sont runis pour dbattre autour des crises (Causes, Dimensions, Raction), thmatique incontournable au moment mme o la crise des dettes souveraines europennes s'intensifiait. Cette confrence fut la 6me organise depuis la cration de cet vnement en 1997 Vancouver, et la seconde tre organise en Europe, et offrait un ventail vari des approches et des thmatiques qui se retrouvent sous la bannire des gographies critiques. Avant de dtailler les thmes et les approches explores pendant la confrence, nous nous proposons de revenir sur la gense et le contexte de cration de cet vnement. 1. Aux origines du groupe international de gographie critique : un positionnement militant et contestataire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".