MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610458755 · doi:10.2514/1.g002635

Kalman-Filter-Based Unconstrained and Constrained Extremum-Seeking Guidance on SO(3)

2017· article· en· W2610458755 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Walsh, James Richard Forbes, Stephen Alexander Chee, John Jens Ryan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtremum Seeking Control Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersArmstrong Flight Research Center
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Kalman filterInvariant extended Kalman filterExtended Kalman filterFast Kalman filterAlpha beta filterEnsemble Kalman filterMathematicsComputer scienceMoving horizon estimationArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extremum-seeking guidance endeavors to drive the output of a system to the extremum of an unknown objective function. This paper proposes an extremum-seeking guidance algorithm on for cases with and without inclusion and exclusion zones. The gradient of the unknown objective function is estimated via a Kalman filter so that the extremum of the objective function can be approximated. To satisfy inclusion and exclusion zone constraints, two different constrained Kalman filters are proposed. The first Kalman filter is a gain-projected Kalman filter, and the second is a novel linear matrix inequality based Kalman filter that is able to accommodate a larger class of constraints. The proposed extremum-seeking guidance algorithm is demonstrated using a performance objective that relates a spacecraft’s attitude to received power of an unknown radiation source using a patch antenna.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Guidance Control and DynamicsSame topicExtremum Seeking Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207