MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610493189 · doi:10.3917/rphi.172.0195

Qu’est-ce que la philosophie de Heidegger a d’original ?

2017· article· fr· W2610493189 on OpenAlex
Isabelle Thomas-Fogiel

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue philosophique de la France et de l étranger · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilosophy, Sociology, Political Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En quoi Heidegger a-t-il transformé en profondeur la manière dont, aujourd’hui encore, nous faisons de la philosophie ? Il ne s’agit pas d’apporter des éléments nouveaux sur un parcours historique très largement documenté, mais de considérer le séisme qu’il a introduit dans l’espace philosophique. Les deux grands gestes principiels en sont une herméneutique comme destruction de la philosophie et l’élection de « l’ordinaire » comme « sol » à partir duquel pourra s’accomplir cette destruction. Ce constat peut conduire à une réflexion sur des évidences aujourd’hui partagées, au-delà de la philosophie continentale, et qu’il conviendrait de mettre à distance en retournant à leur origine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.010
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it