MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610594007 · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2017.2701819

An Improved Approach for N-Linked Glycan Structure Identification from HCD MS/MS Spectra

2017· article· en· W2610594007 on OpenAlexafffund
Weiping Sun, Yi Liu, Gills A. Lajoie, Bin Ma, Kaizhong Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGlycanGlycoproteomicsComputational biologyGlycosylationTandem mass spectrometryComputer scienceIdentification (biology)SoftwareMass spectrometryChemistryData miningBiologyChromatographyGlycoproteinBiochemistryProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glycosylation is a frequently observed post-translational modification on proteins. Currently, tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) serves as an efficient analytical technique for characterizing structures of oligosaccharides. However, developing effective computational approaches for identifying glycan structures from mass spectra is still a great challenge in glycoproteomics research. In this study, we proposed an approach for matching the input spectra with glycan structures acquired from a glycan structure database by incorporating a de novo sequencing assisted ranking scheme. The proposed approach is implemented as a software tool, GlycoNovoDB, for automated glycan structure identification from HCD MS/MS of glycopeptides. Experimental results showed that GlycoNovoDB can identify glycans effectively and has better performance than our previously proposed de novo sequencing algorithm as well as another software GlycoMaster DB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.699

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and BioinformaticsSame topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchFrench-language works237,207