MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610662262 · doi:10.7202/1034570ar

Sur la ferme à Maggie : les camps pour la paix en Grande-Bretagne

2016· article· fr· W2610662262 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
James L. Wood, Patricia A. Wood, Robert A. Mitchell, Pierrette Aubert

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Review of Community Development · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunism, Protests, Social Movements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce texte aborde une nouvelle forme de protestation politique : le Mouvement des camps pour la paix en Grande-Bretagne. Cette expérience nouvelle fait partie du Mouvement pour le désarmement nucléaire en Grande-Bretagne, lequel englobe, à son tour, la Campagne pour le désarmement nucléaire (CDN). Au début, les femmes campaient de manière plutôt spontanée à proximité de la base aérienne de la commune de Greenham, en signe de protestation contre l’installation des missiles de croisière à ce même endroit. Ce geste théâtral provoqua la création de quelque quatorze camps autour des autres bases militaires américaines en Grande-Bretagne. Le texte se propose de faire ressortir les caractéristiques fondamentales de ces camps de la paix, leur action de protestation contre les armes nucléaires et leurs accomplissements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Review of Community DevelopmentSame topicCommunism, Protests, Social MovementsFrench-language works237,207