Dimension affective de la relation enseignant-élève avec les adolescents : revue des études longitudinales et perspective de l’attachement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En France, la dimension affective de la relation enseignant-élève fait l’objet d’une controverse et les travaux en psychologie de l’éducation dans ce champ n’ont pas été intégrés aux formations d’enseignants. Pourtant, de très nombreux travaux ont montré les effets positifs pour les élèves d’une relation chaleureuse et peu conflictuelle avec l’enseignant. L’objectif de ce travail est de présenter la première synthèse francophone des résultats des études longitudinales montrant les effets de la relation affective enseignant-adolescents. Les 24 études recensées mettent en évidence des effets positifs tant scolaires qu’extrascolaires. Ces résultats sont ensuite interprétés à la lumière de la théorie de l’attachement et des systèmes comportementaux. Les perspectives de recherche et les implications pratiques de cette interprétation sont discutées en conclusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.031 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".