Sustaining the Knowledge Commons: A Correlation Study of Journals Using Article Processing Charges
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sustaining the Knowledge Commons, funded throughSSHRC's Insight Development Program aims totransition scholarly publishing from subscriptions /purchase to open access. This presentation focuseson a correlational study of DOAJ journals, exploringrelationships between tendency to charge articleprocessing charges, subjects and number of articles.Le Soutien au patrimoine de connaissances, financépar le Programme de développement Savoir du CRSHvise à faire passer l’édition savante du mode parabonnement ou par achat au mode libre accès. Cetteprésentation se concentre sur une étude decorrélation de revues disponibles en libre accès(DOAJ), en explorant les relations entre la tendance àfacturer des frais de traitement pour un article, lessujets et le nombre d’articles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.021 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it