APLICABILIDADE DA ESCALA MOTORA INFANTIL ALBERTA: EXPERIÊNCIA COM CRIANÇAS PREMATURAS NO NUTEP
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Escala Motora Infantil de Alberta (AIMS) possibilita a avaliacao e identificacao precoce de desvios motores no sentido de favorecer o desenvolvimento motor adequado das criancas. O relato tem como objetivo descrever a experiencia da aplicabilidade da AIMS em criancas prematuras no NUTEP. A Escala e um importante instrumento para identificar atraso no desenvolvimento motor. De facil aplicabilidade e baixo custo, e, ainda, norteadora para a intervencao dos profissionais no setor de Fisioterapia atraves do seguimento das etapas motoras e sua maior divulgacao visa a possibilidade de aplicacao em Unidades Basicas de Saude, creches, servicos de follow-up e ambulatorios pediatricos. Os resultados indicam que e um protocolo objetivo para a triagem dos bebes com atrasos motores, cuja utilizacao norteia a intervencao dos profissionais de fisioterapia e orienta os pais sobre as posturas a serem estimuladas em domicilio para alcancar a evolucao do desenvolvimento motor da crianca.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".