Les banques d’aliments et l’effondrement des garanties minimales de l’assistance sociale au Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’approvisionnement des pauvres en nourriture au Canada est devenu une préoccupation majeure des organisations bénévoles, comme l’atteste la rapide croissance du nombre de banques d’aliments. Celles-ci visent à collecter, entreposer et distribuer à des organisations charitables capables de les utiliser à bon escient, des surplus d’aliments qui autrement seraient gaspillés. Les banques d’aliments se perçoivent généralement comme complémentaires aux programmes d’assistance gouvernementale et ne veulent d’aucune façon se substituer à eux. Le développement des banques d’aliments doit être perçu à la fois comme un symptôme et comme un symbole de la crise de confiance qui ébranle l’État-providence : signe de l’effondrement des garanties minimales de l’assistance sociale, les banques sont aussi l’expression tangible (quoique involontaire) du point de vue conservateur selon lequel les coûts sociaux des changements démographiques et technologiques doivent être pris en charge par les organisations bénévoles et non par l’État.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".