MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610773484 · doi:10.7202/1039538ar

Crises et conflits au Moyen-Orient

2017· article· fr· W2610773484 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kamal Bayramzadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes internationales · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMiddle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article analyse les enjeux sécuritaires des conflits au Moyen-Orient et leurs conséquences sur les relations irano-turques, marquées par des divergences relatives à la problématique de la sécurité régionale en fonction de la perception de la sécurité nationale, notamment depuis le conflit syrien. L’étude montre que le changement des rapports de force au Moyen-Orient a créé de nouveaux enjeux sécuritaires porteurs d’aspects politique, militaire, économique et sociétal. Le Moyen-Orient est confronté, d’une part, à une forme inédite de lutte d’influence entre les puissances régionales – notamment l’Arabie saoudite, l’Iran et la Turquie – et, d’autre part, aux activités des acteurs non étatiques impliqués dans la guerre en Syrie et en Irak. Ce nouveau rapport de force a engendré un dilemme de sécurité ; par ailleurs, les crises et les conflits en Irak, en Syrie et au Yémen ont provoqué une situation chaotique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes internationalesSame topicMiddle East and Rwanda ConflictsFrench-language works237,207