MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Empirical mode decomposition analysis of alcohol withdrawal tremor signals

2016· article· en· W2610913116 on OpenAlexaff
Narges Norouzi, Parham Aarabi, Taylor Dear, Sally Carver, Simon Bromberg, Mel Kahan, Sara Gray, Bjug Borgundvaag

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalSchwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine InstituteWomen's College HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHilbert–Huang transformAlcohol withdrawal syndromeRating scaleMean squared errorComputer scienceMode (computer interface)Physical medicine and rehabilitationEnergy (signal processing)Artificial intelligenceStatisticsMathematicsAlcoholMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we have introduced a novel method to extract involuntary tremor movement activity in patients with Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome (AWS). Using the Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), we show that the variations of energy of the tremor and voluntary activity can be distinguished in different Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMF) of the recorded tremor signals. To measure the performance of our method in extracting the tremor activity and eventually developing a shortened, more objective AWS assessment tool, we compared the electronic tremor assessment employing our new technique with the consensus rating from 3 expert physicians on a 7-point scale. Based on a 3-fold cross-validation on 104 recordings from 64 patients with AW, we found that our proposed method achieves an average Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.71 with respect to the consensus rating, a significant improvement over prior work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.288
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAlcoholism and Thiamine DeficiencyFrench-language works237,207