MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610948442 · doi:10.82308/51667

McSAF: An extensible static analysis framework for the MATLAB language

2012· article· en· W2610948442 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jesse Doherty

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Physics and Python Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceCompilerProgramming languageSyntaxMATLABProgrammerSemantics (computer science)Software engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MATLAB is a popular language for scientific and numerical programming. Despite its popularity, there are few active rojects providing open tools for MATLAB related compiler research. This thesis provides the McLAB Static Analysis Framework, McSAF, the goal of which is to simplify the development of new compiler tools for MATLAB. The McLAB project was started in order to develop such tools in the hopes of attracting further research. The goal of the project is to provide an extensible compiler toolkit for MATLAB and scientific programming. It is intended to explore the compilation challenges unique to MATLAB and to explore new language features that could help scientific programmers be more productive. One piece of functionality that is particularly important for compiler research is the ability to perform static analysis. Without the information provided by static analyses, program transformations and optimizations, and automated programmer feedback would not be possible. In order to make the development of static analyses simpler, this thesis contributes a framework for creating static analyses for the MATLAB language. This framework is intended to make writing analyses easier by providing core functionality and API for developing such analyses. It also aims to make analysis development easier by providing an intermediate representation called McLAST, which provides simpler syntax and explicitly exposes some of MATLAB's semantics. In order to give analysis writers a head start, some example analyses are provided. These include simple analyses intended to demonstrate the use of the framework, and some more complicated analyses that provide basic semantic information about MATLAB programs. In addition to the framework making development of analyses simpler, McSAF is also designed to be extended to new language features. Not only can the framework be extended, but existing analyses can also be extended. This allows work that was previously done for analyzing MATLAB code to be applied to future language extensions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicComputational Physics and Python ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207