MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2611008245 · doi:10.7202/1033538ar

Un cabinet d’égyptologue au Siècle des Lumières : le cabinet d’histoire naturelle du docteur Gagnon au Musée Stendhal de Grenoble (France)

2015· article· fr· W2611008245 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joëlle Rochas

Bibliographic record

VenueMuséologies Les cahiers d études supérieures · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtCabinet (room)Visual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans Vie de Henry Brulard, Stendhal évoque la maison grenobloise de son grand-père, demeure devenue depuis le Musée Stendhal. Il y décrit et dessine le cabinet d’histoire naturelle type du Siècle des Lumières, celui-là même qu’aurait constitué le docteur Gagnon, son aïeul. En 2008, à la maison Gagnon, on amorce la reconstitution du cabinet. Joëlle Rochas, experte scientifique attitrée à cette reconstitution, rend compte dans cet article des différentes étapes de ce projet et des divers problèmes qui ont dû être réglés entre son idéation et sa réalisation, tout en révélant sa portée historique et signifiante.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.199

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.011
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMuséologies Les cahiers d études supérieuresSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207