MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W261107079

THE CONTRIBUTION OF COMMERCIAL AVIATION TO THE ECONOMY OF MANITOBA: AN ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT

2003· article· en· W261107079 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
JF Bekker, Barry E. Prentice

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicAviation Industry Analysis and Trends
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAviationWrightDestinationsAviation engineeringInternational airportTourismCommercial aviationAir transportEconomic impact analysisMode (computer interface)EconomyAeronauticsBusinessRegional scienceEngineeringGeographyCivil aviationTransport engineeringEconomicsComputer scienceCivil engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In December 1903, the Wright brothers achieved the first manned, controlled, powered airplane flight. The ensuing development of aviation contributed outstandingly to overcoming the limitations presented by temporal, spatial and topographical barriers. In Manitoba, aviation provides a critical link in the transportation network. The air mode provides vital connections between remote northern areas and larger provincial areas. It also connects all Manitobans to international destinations via the Winnipeg International Airport. The contribution by the air mode in facilitating the general economy is widely acknowledged. However, the contribution of commercial aviation to the Manitoba economy is unquantified. This paper reposts on the economic impact of commercial aviation with the Province of Manitoba for the year 2001. It outlines the structure of the industry and introduces the methodology and also reports the quantification of the aviation industry in Manitoba in terms of direct, indirect and induced economic impacts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAviation Industry Analysis and TrendsFrench-language works237,207