Erectile Dysfunction Secondary to Pudendal Nerve Injury Complicating Orthopedic Surgery: Practical Recommandations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Erectile dysfunction (ED) resulting from direct damage of pudendal nerve injury during orthopedic surgery is common and closely associated to the use of traction tables. Prolonged countertraction on the fracture table and the inappropriate placement of the perineal post are the two main contributing factors. Clinical signs are essentially sensitive, such as hypoesthesia of the perineum. Urinary incontinence, ED and hypoesthesia or complete anesthesia of scrotum and glans penis are the main clinical manifestations. Electrophysiological examinations should be considered when symptoms are not regressive and in cases of vesico-sphincter dysfunction and immediate severe ED. No medical treatment has demonstrated its effectiveness. Pudendal nerve decompression was reported to be useful in some cases. Preventive measures should be considered by surgeons to avoid perineal traction injuries. Patients must be clearly informed about this possible neurological complication before an operation on the orthopedic table. J Curr Surg. 2017;7(1-2):1-3 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcs322e
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".