Recherche et pratique : sensibiliser les enseignants en école professionnelle aux dimensions identitaires négociées dans l’interaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette contribution porte sur des interventions ponctuelles dans le cadre de la formation continue d’enseignants en école professionnelle en Suisse. Ces interventions s’appuient sur une recherche interactionnelle menée dans des dispositifs de formation professionnelle initiale. Il s’agit d’une étude qui cherche à mieux comprendre la construction des trajectoires de formation des apprentis au fil des interactions auxquelles ils participent en école ou sur la place de travail. En travaillant sur des séquences de données audio-vidéo à partir d’outils issus de la linguistique interactionnelle et multimodale, les participants à la formation sont sensibilisés à ce qui se passe dans la communication en classe, et en particulier aux dimensions identitaires négociées dans l’interaction. Revenir sur ces interventions, de leur conception à leur mise en œuvre, permet de mettre en question la façon dont elles peuvent servir la formation. De façon plus globale, nos réflexions portent sur le rapport entre recherche et pratique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.039 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".