MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2611374813 · doi:10.29173/cais929

SINCERITY: A New Bilingual Search engine for Image Retrieval in a Bilingual Context

2016· article· en· W2611374813 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Élaine Ménard, Jonathan Dorey

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSincerityContext (archaeology)HumanitiesComputer scienceLinguisticsArtPhilosophyPsychologyHistorySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This poster presents a research project that aims todevelop an interface model for image retrieval(SINCERITY) in a bilingual (French and English)context, that is, when the query language differs fromthe indexing language. This poster will summarize theresults of the first and second phases of the projectand will present the preliminary results of the usertesting. Once fully developed, SINCERITY is intendedto be an innovative tool for image searchers who arelooking for ordinary images. The main contribution ofthis project lies in bridging a gap for unilingual imagesearchers. The bilingual search interface willconstitute a definite benefit for image searchersunfamiliar with more than one language, by givingthem user-friendly access to visual resources.Cette affiche présente un projet de recherche qui viseà développer un modèle d’interface pour la recherched’image (SINCERITY) dans un contexte bilingue(français et anglais), c’est-à-dire quand le langage derequête diffère de la langue d’indexation. Cetteaffiche résumera les résultats des première etdeuxième phases du projet et présentera les résultatspréliminaires des essais par l’utilisateur. Une foispleinement développé, SINCERITY entend devenir unoutil innovant pour les chercheurs d’image qui sont àla recherche d’images ordinaires. La contributionprincipale de ce projet est de combler une lacunepour les chercheurs unilingues. L’interface derecherche bilingue constitue un avantage certain pourles chercheurs qui ne sont familiers qu’avec uneseule langue, en leur donnant un accès convivial auxressources visuelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.007
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSISame topicImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207