MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2611374813 · doi:10.29173/cais929

SINCERITY: A New Bilingual Search engine for Image Retrieval in a Bilingual Context

2016· article· en· W2611374813 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Élaine Ménard, Jonathan Dorey

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSincerityContext (archaeology)HumanitiesComputer scienceLinguisticsArtPhilosophyPsychologyHistorySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This poster presents a research project that aims todevelop an interface model for image retrieval(SINCERITY) in a bilingual (French and English)context, that is, when the query language differs fromthe indexing language. This poster will summarize theresults of the first and second phases of the projectand will present the preliminary results of the usertesting. Once fully developed, SINCERITY is intendedto be an innovative tool for image searchers who arelooking for ordinary images. The main contribution ofthis project lies in bridging a gap for unilingual imagesearchers. The bilingual search interface willconstitute a definite benefit for image searchersunfamiliar with more than one language, by givingthem user-friendly access to visual resources.Cette affiche présente un projet de recherche qui viseà développer un modèle d’interface pour la recherched’image (SINCERITY) dans un contexte bilingue(français et anglais), c’est-à-dire quand le langage derequête diffère de la langue d’indexation. Cetteaffiche résumera les résultats des première etdeuxième phases du projet et présentera les résultatspréliminaires des essais par l’utilisateur. Une foispleinement développé, SINCERITY entend devenir unoutil innovant pour les chercheurs d’image qui sont àla recherche d’images ordinaires. La contributionprincipale de ce projet est de combler une lacunepour les chercheurs unilingues. L’interface derecherche bilingue constitue un avantage certain pourles chercheurs qui ne sont familiers qu’avec uneseule langue, en leur donnant un accès convivial auxressources visuelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSISame topicImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207