Zika Virus Speed and Direction: Reconstructing Zika Introduction in Brazil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ObjectiveTo estimate the velocity of Zika virus disease spread in Brazil usingdata on confirmed Zika virus disease cases at the municipal-level.IntroductionLocal transmission of Zika virus has been confirmed in67 countries worldwide and in 46 countries or territories in theAmericas (1,2). On February 1, 2016 the World Health Organizationdeclared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern due tothe increase in microcephaly cases and other neurological disordersreported in Brazil (2). Several countries issued travel warnings forpregnant women travelling to Zika-affected countries with Brazil,Colombia, Ecuador, and El Salvador advising against pregnancy(3-7). The risk of local transmission in unaffected regions is unknownbut potentially significant where competent Zika vectors are present(8) and also given the additional complexities of sexual transmissionand population mobility (9,10). Despite the rapid spread of Zikavirus across the Americas and global concerns regarding its effectson fetuses, little is known about the pattern of spread. Knowledge ofthe direction and the speed of movement of disease is invaluable forpublic health response planning, including the timing and placementof interventions.MethodsData for this analysis were obtained from the Brazil Ministryof Health and consisted of confirmed cases of Zika virus disease.The centroids of the municipalities were taken in meters from theshapefiles and used to perform a surface trend analysis. Surfacetrend is a spatial interpolation method used to estimate continuoussurfaces from point data. The continuous surface of time to infectionwas estimated by regressing it against the X and Y coordinates. Timewas in days and X and Y coordinates were meters. Parameters wereestimated using least squares regression and velocity (in km per day)was obtained by inverting the final magnitude of the slope.ResultsData provided from the Brazil Ministry of Health on May 31,2016, indicated that Zika had been confirmed in 316 of the 5,564municipalities in Brazil representing 26 states, with six additionalmunicipalities identified from other reporting sources. Our modelsindicated a southward pattern of introduction of Zika starting fromthe northeast coast towards the southeastern coastal states of Rio deJanerio, Espírito Santo, and São Paulo. There was also a pattern ofwestern movement towards Bolivia. Overall, the average speed ofdiffusion was 42.1 km/day across all models was 6.9 km/day to amaximum of 634.1 km/day. The municipalities in the Northeast andNorth regions had the slowest speeds whereas the municipalities inthe Central-West and Southeast regions had the highest speeds. Thisis due to proximity of cases in time and space, with more cases havingoccurred closer in time and over larger areas in South, Southeast, andCentral-West regions resulting in faster rates of introduction.ConclusionsThe average speed of spread was 42 km per day and it tookapproximately five to six months for Zika to spread from thenortheastern coast to the southeastern coast and western border ofBrazil. The rapid spread of Zika can help us understand its possiblefuture directions and the pace at which it travels, which are key fortargeted mosquito control interventions, public health messaging, andtravel advisories. A multi-country analysis is needed to understand thecontinental spatial and temporal patterns of dispersion of Zika virus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".