MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2611452873

Актуальность коррекции плоскостопия у воспитанников кадетского корпуса в процессе профессионально-прикладной подготовки

2016· article· ru· W2611452873 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Селитреникова Татьяна Анатольевна, Лернер Виктория Леонидовна, Козадаев Максим Геннадьевич

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychological-Pedagogical Journal GAUDEAMUS · 2016
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldMedicine
TopicHuman Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical developmentPsychologyMedical educationQuarter (Canadian coin)Applied psychologyPedagogyDevelopmental psychologyMedicineGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In article the authors considered problems of prevalence of diseases of the supporting-motor apparatus at teenagers in general and pupils of Suvorov Military Schools in particular and reflected aspects and some features of training of future military having flat-footedness of initial degrees to development by them methods of professional and applied physical training and problems of incidence of the supporting-motor apparatus at children and teenagers in Russia and abroad. Now in Russia more than a half of children of preschool age and a quarter of teenagers have the diagnosis «Flat-footedness». It indicates the need of special approach to process of their physical training, especially in case further they plan to connect the life with those professions in the course of which development there are essential physical activities. In article the authors considered features of future profession of teenagers at assessment of level of their physical health in the field of formation of the supporting-motor apparatus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.226
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychological-Pedagogical Journal GAUDEAMUSSame topicHuman Health and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207