Impact of intensified antiretroviral therapy during early HIV infection on gut immunology and inflammatory blood biomarkers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Standard antiretroviral therapy (ART) is slow to reverse gut mucosal immune defects that cause persistent inflammation and immune activation. We examined whether intensifying early-administered ART through the addition of maraviroc and raltegravir would accelerate their resolution. DESIGN: ART-naïve men with early HIV infection were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive ART (emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate + lopinavir/ritonavir), together with either combined placebo or raltegravir + maraviroc, for 48 weeks. In a predefined substudy, paired blood and sigmoid biopsies were collected at baseline and week 48. Mucosal CD4 T-cell immune subsets (Th1, Th17, and Th22 cells), CD8 T-cell immune activation, and soluble blood markers of inflammation (IL-6, IL-17, macrophage inflammatory protein-1b, soluble CD14, and IL-10) and coagulation (D-dimer) were measured. RESULTS: A total of 22 participants were enrolled, a median of 4 months after HIV acquisition. At baseline, there was substantial systemic and mucosal immune activation, and gut CD4 T-cell numbers, Th22 cell numbers, and Th17 cell function were reduced compared with controls. Early ART restored gut Th22 numbers, improved but did not restore overall CD4 numbers, and had no impact on Th17 function. Plasma levels of soluble CD14 and D-dimer normalized, whereas other inflammatory cytokines were reduced but not normalized. ART intensification had no impact on any blood or gut immune parameters. CONCLUSION: Early HIV infection causes substantial mucosal and systemic immune activation, and gut CD4 T-cell dysfunction. One year of ART improved but did not normalize most parameters, regardless of intensification with raltegravir and maraviroc, and did not restore mucosal Th17 function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".