MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2611637324 · doi:10.12962/j25983806.v16.i1.33

Studi Optimasi IPAL Komunal Kota Malang dengan Pendekatan Model Stella

2016· article· id· W2611637324 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Purifikasi · 2016
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Automation and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceSTELLA (programming language)ForestryGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hasil analisa kandungan bahan organik berupa Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) dan Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) pada badan air Sungai Brantas sebesar 92 mg/L dan 192 mg/L yang menandakan adanya pencemaran pada badan air disekitar IPAL Komunal. Kinerja IPAL Komunal yang belum optimal merupakan salah satu penyebab tingginya kandungan organik. Faktor tersebut dapat dioptimalkan menggunakan model Stella terhadap efluen IPAL Komunal dengan data kualitas influen serta fraksi removal unit pengolahan. Konfigurasi unit yang paling optimal diantara seluruh konfigurasi unit IPAL di Kota Malang yaitu tangki septik dan Anaerobic Baffle Reactor (ABR) dengan media filter dan waktu tinggal 28 jam. Hasil simulasi model Stella IPAL memiliki efisiensi removal terhadap BOD dan COD 100%, serta TSS 99% dengan debit influen 0.83 liter/detik.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it