MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2611660746 · doi:10.25011/cim.v30i4.2876

Mast cells release cytokines in response to mediators produced by virus-infected epithelial cellss

2007· article· en· W2611660746 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Candy W. S. Tsang, A. Dean Befus

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and investigative medicine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMast cells and histamine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytokineTLR3ImmunologyMast cellInterleukin 33Innate immune systemBiologyImmune systemChemokineToll-like receptorTLR7TLR9InflammationInterleukin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Mast cells have long been recognized for their involvement in allergic diseases. In the last decade, the importance of mast cells in innate responses against bacteria has been established, but little is known about their contribution in viral infections. Mast cells are abundant at mucosal surfaces such as the lungs in close proximity to the epithelium. In the lung, the epithelium is a primary target for viral infections. Mast cells are secondarily exposed to newly formed virions released from epithelial cells. Mast cells have toll-like receptors (TLRs) that detect various pathogen components. Our first hypothesis is that viral TLR agonists will induce mast cells to release cytokines thought to be involved in viral infections. Both the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 and the chemokine IL-8 are produced during viral infections. TGF-β is an immunoregulatory cytokine that modulates the activity of various immune cells and could also play a role in viral infections. Methods: We used polyI:C, a synthetic double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), as a TLR3 agonist, loxoribine as a TLR7 agonist, and unmethylated CpG DNA as a TLR9 agonist. We treated mast cells from the cell line HMC-1 (Human Mast cell-1) for 0.5 – 24hr with the TLR agonists and performed dose response studies for all stimuli. Supernatants from treated mast cells were measured for IL-6, IL-8, and TGF-β by ELISA. Results: Cytokine release was highest at the 24hr time point. Mast cells released IL-6, IL-8, and TGF-β in response to the TLR3 agonist polyI:C in a dose-dependent manner, but not to the other viral TLR agonists. PolyI:C (10μg/mL) versus unstimulated controls significantly increased mast cell release of IL-6 (224.7±57.4 vs. 39.0±5.7, p≤0.001) and TGF-β (240.2±28.9 vs. 116.1±16.7, p≤0.05). PolyI:C induced release of IL-8 from mast cells was increased but not significant. Viral exposure also induces epithelial cells to produce type I interferons, IFNα and β. These interferons have potent antiviral activity, but also have effects on mast cells, decreasing mast cell adhesion to extracellular matrix and reducing co-stimulatory activity on T cells. Our second hypothesis is that IFNα and β will induce mast cells to release cytokines similar to stimulation with polyI:C. Our preliminary data showed that IFNα, IFNβ , and IFNα and β in combination induced a low level of IL-8 and TGF-β release from mast cells, but had no effect on IL-6 release. Conclusion: HMC-1 responds to dsRNA, a TLR3 agonist produced in epithelial cells during viral replication, by releasing IL-6 and TGF-β. HMC-1 also responds to IFNα and β by releasing IL-8 and TGF-β, indicating that human mast cells respond to epithelial mediators produced during viral infections. Our results show that mast cells contribute to the innate response against viruses by responding to mediators released by virus-infected epithelial cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and investigative medicineSame topicMast cells and histamineFrench-language works237,207