MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2611692661 · doi:10.1007/s12594-017-0615-x

Gas Hydrates: A Possible Future Energy Resource

2017· article· en· W2611692661 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kalachand Sain

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Geological Society of India · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyResource (disambiguation)Clathrate hydrateEnergy (signal processing)Earth scienceHydrogeologyGeochemistryMining engineeringPetroleum engineeringGeotechnical engineeringHydrateComputer scienceChemistryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy is one of the main drivers for the sustainable development of any country like India. More than 80% of global energy requirements including India are met by fossil fuels. However, India produces only 30% of her energy requirements indigenously, and spends a huge amount of money in importing the remaining. Moreover, discovery of major oil/gas fields has remained almost stagnant during the last few decades. The rising demand for carbon emission-free energy and dwindling trend of conventional fossil fuels necessitates looking for an alternate source of energy. Gas hydrates, crystalline form of methane (99.9%) and water, are envisaged to provide one of the best feasible solutions for the future generations because of their huge potential and natural occurrences. The successful production tests in Mckenzie delta of Canada in 2008, in Alaska of USA in 2012, and in Nankai Trough off Japan in 2013 have provided an impetus to the scientific and technological community for the delineation & assessment of gas hydrates, followed by development of production technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Geological Society of IndiaSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207