MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2611708633 · doi:10.14740/wjon1011w

Repeated Multiple Neurofibromatosis Type 1 in the Right Lower Limb: A Case Report

2017· article· en· W2611708633 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Leitao Huang, Yi Ding, Qi Lai, Xia Wu, Wei Li, Gendong Huang, Min Dai, Bing Zhang

Post-publication record

NatureRetraction
ReasonConflict of Interest;Notice - Limited or No Information;
Date12/8/2017 0:00
Flagged by OpenAlex?Yes

Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement; it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeurofibromaNeurofibromatosisPathologicalMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologyNeurofibromatosis type ISurgerySoft tissuePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal-dominant genetic disease characterized by the presence of multiple neurofibromas. We encountered a unique case of NF1 that manifested as a recurrent soft tissue neurofibroma in the right lower limb that developed over a period of 16 years. The patient presented with a painless mass that was initially diagnosed as inflammatory changes via computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. However, the condition was subsequently diagnosed as an intraneural neurofibroma via pathological and immunohistochemical examination, which showed a focal to patchy lymphocytic chronic inflammatory infiltrate and several non-encapsulated masses with clear boundaries that were easily distinguishable from the adjacent neurofibroma. The mass relapsed three times over 3 years since it was discovered, for which the patient underwent comprehensive and complete local resection several times. Postoperative continuous follow-up confirmed that the patient recovered well. Early and complete surgical resection is an effective method for treating and preventing recurrent neurofibromas. However, because of the importance of pathologic examination in the diagnosis of such cases, this uncommon entity might be underreported in patients with NF1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0060.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of OncologySame topicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma CasesFrench-language works237,207