Listing of forthcoming and published papers available on line
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Through the courtesy of the American Society of Human Genetics continuously updated listing of titles and abstracts of papers that have been accepted for publication in Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics or that have appeared in this Journal since the begin ning of 1989 can be accessed at no cost from the bulletin board system (BBS) operated by the American Society of Human Genet ics as a pilot project of facilitate communication among its mem bers.In addition to listing papers of the American Journal of Human Genetics there are listings of upcoming genetics meetings, of available positions, and other matters of interest to geneticists.Easy to use search programs allow rapid retrieval of material of interest to users.Additional features will probably be added.Access requires a computer terminal or microcomputer with dial-out (modem) capability.The BBS is available 24 h day and may be accessed by calling (toll free) (800) 346 4089 (United States, except Connecticut), or (800) 346 9837 (Canada).Con necticut users may call (toll) (203) 548 5760.The proper setup mode for communication with the BBS is 300, 1200, or 2400 baud, no parity, 1 stop bit, and 8-bit word size.Dial
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.856 | 0.850 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".