Capacity of Burst Noise-Erasure Channels With and Without Feedback and Input Cost
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A class of burst noise-erasure channels which incorporate both errors and erasures during transmission is studied. The channel, whose output is explicitly expressed in terms of its input and a stationary ergodic noise-erasure process, is shown to have a so-called "quasi-symmetry" property under certain invertibility conditions. As a result, it is proved that a uniformly distributed input process maximizes the channel's block mutual information, resulting in a closed-form formula for its non-feedback capacity in terms of the noise-erasure entropy rate and the entropy rate of an auxiliary erasure process. The feedback channel capacity is also characterized, showing that feedback does not increase capacity and generalizing prior related results. The capacity-cost function of the channel with and without feedback is also investigated. A sequence of finite-letter upper bounds for the capacity-cost function without feedback is derived. Finite-letter lower bonds for the capacity-cost function with feedback are obtained using a specific encoding rule. Based on these bounds, it is demonstrated both numerically and analytically that feedback can increase the capacity-cost function for a class of channels with Markov noise-erasure processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".