A via de parto interfere nas atividades cotidianas no puerpério imediato?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introdução: O parto vaginal e a cesariana podem gerar desconfortos comprometendo as atividades funcionais no puerpério. Objetivos: Comparar a dor, a amplitude de movimento (ADM), o desempenho e a limitação funcional de primíparas após o parto vaginal e cesariana. Métodos: Utilizou-se a versão curta do questionário de dor McGill (VC-QDM), a escala visual analógica (EVA), a intensidade de dor presente (IDP), o flexímetro, o teste timed up and go (TUG) e o questionário de limitação funcional. Resultados: Após o parto vaginal, houve relatos de dor “dolorida à palpação” e “cortante” com intensidade severa e IDP desconfortante. Após a cesariana, a ADM de flexão e rotações do tronco foram menores, maior intensidade de dor e necessidade de mais tempo para realização das atividades do TUG, mostrando pior desempenho funcional. Algumas limitações funcionais estiveram presente independente da via de parto. Conclusão: O grupo cesariana apresentou menor ADM, maior intensidade de dor e pior desempenho funcional. Contudo, a maioria das puérperas apresentou alguma limitação funcional.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".