Assessment of Heavy Metals Pollution in Tide and Shelf Zone Sediments along the Southern Part of Gaza Strip Coast, Palestine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated the grain-size distribution of the sands in two lines survey, the tide and shelf zones along southern part of the Gaza Strip Coast, Palestine. In addition; the study evaluated the concentrations of Zn, Pb, Mn, Cu, Co, and Cd in the sands in the study area. Ten sampling sites were selected divided between the tide and the shelf zones. The grain-size distributions of the sand samples were determined by sieving method. While, the heavy metal concentrations were determined and analyzed by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. The predominant grain size of sands in the tide zone was medium to fine-grained while in the shelf zone was fine- to very fine-grained. The concentration of Zn, Pb, Mn, Cu, Co, and Cd in the sands of tide zone in the study area range from 5.25 to 20.66, 13.54 to 16, 12.57 to 41.96, 0.8 to 1.46, 2.52 to 3.14, and 0.68 to 1 mg/kg respectively; while the concentrations of these elements in the shelf zone were 12.78 to 19.06, 12.85 to 19.5, 123.8 to 407.1, 0.26 to 3.86, 4.84 to 6.91, and 1.25 to 1.45 mg/kg respectively. The high level concentrations of the selected heavy metals were found in shelf zone, except the Zn its high level was in the tide zone. The pollution of the selected heavy metals in the sands of the study area were under the limits with respects the EPA and the Ontario standard limits. While for Cd concentration was above the limit with respect to the EPA and the Ontario standard limits. Domestic untreated wastewater discharges and fishing activities in the area may possibly the major source of the observed higher levels of heavy metals pollution, especially the cadmium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".