Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mediteransko mišljenje Alberta Camusa i filozofija povijestiSažetak Filozofija povijesti u svojoj osnovi sadrži tezu da ljudska povijest ima svoj smisao, početak i kraj, da postoje pokretačke snage povijesti, da povijesno gibanje, tijekom vlastita linearnog, progresivnog kretanja, smjera ispunjenju vlastite svrhe i cilja, čije ozbiljenje dovodi do eshatološkog kraja povijesti.Filozofijskopovijesni pristup svjetskoj povijesti kao smislenoj cjelini s početkom i krajem ne susreće se u temeljima zapadnoeuropske tradicije.U antičkoj grčkoj filozofiji, na čijoj se tradiciji temelji mediteransko mišljenje Alberta Camusa, historijska zbivanja uglavnom se vide kao kružno kretanje analogno prirodi.Odbijajući povijesni apsolutizam koji za račun eshatološke budućnosti žrtvuje čovjekovu sadašnjost, Camus se vraća nepobjedivom zahtjevu ljudske naravi čiju tajnu čuva Mediteran.Svojom mediteranskom filozofijom Camus suprotstavlja mjeru -savršenstvu, prirodu -povijesti,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".