The Pharmacognosy and Therapeutic Efficacy of Turmeric (Curcuma Longa): A Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Turmeric is a well-known natural product, native to Southeast Asia, commonly used for a variety of cultural traditions and health benefits. Generally referred to as curcumin, it is a member of the Zingiberaceae, or ginger family, utilized for its roots and known for its vibrant yellow hue. Culturally, it is primarily incorporated into cooking and as an integral part of religious rituals and ceremonies. Chemically, turmeric is classified as a phenolic compound, made up of many curcuminoids, each with varying levels of activity. Therapeutically, its health benefits include anti-inflammatory, anti-hyperlipidemia, anti-oxidant and anti-pruritic properties. The pharmacognosy of curcumin modulates inflammatory molecules and oxidative stress mediators associated with the pathology of various conditions. Measuring clinical improvements in pain scores using various scales such as the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and the visual analog scale (VAS), reached significance when assessing for therapeutic efficacy in patients with osteoarthritis. Other studies for pruritus and hyperlipidemia also reached significance when measuring biomarkers of oxidative stress and lipid levels to determine therapeutic efficacy in the respective disease states. Doses vary based upon the disease state, but most patients typically tolerate high doses, up to 12 g per day. However, because of its chemistry, turmeric is poorly absorbed, quickly metabolized, and rapidly eliminated, restricting therapeutic efficacy and overall bioavailability. Combined piperine formulations may enhance bioavailability and absorption of curcumin into the body. Other limitations that exist when determining true therapeutic efficacy of curcumin include a wide variation of sample populations, with very specific disease characteristics, and a biased group of researchers because the same group of authors publish many studies. Therefore, the ability to extrapolate the conclusions from these trials to the average population is limited. Ongoing studies are currently exploring therapeutic properties and efficacy of turmeric in cancer and dementia as a potential future treatment option.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".