MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612093369 · doi:10.1149/ma2017-01/14/910

Boron Subphthalocyanines, Boron Subnaphthalocyanines and Silicon Phthalocyanines As Non-Fullerene Electron Accepting Materials in Organic Photovoltaics (and Tetrabenzocorroles as Complimentary Electron Donating Materials)

2017· article· en· W2612093369 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Timothy P. Bender

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrganic solar cellMaterials sciencePhotovoltaicsPhotovoltaic systemHeterojunctionNanotechnologyOrganic electronicsFullereneSolar cellOptoelectronicsChemistryOrganic chemistryTransistorPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For some time, our group has been focused on the design and synthesis of derivatives of boron subphthalocyanine (BsubPc) for application in organic electronics with a specific focus on organic photovoltaics and light emitting diodes; during this presentation however I will focus specifically on their application in organic photovoltaics. I will begin by focusing on our efforts with regards to synthetic variants of BsubPcs and their application in planar heterojunction organic photovoltaic cells (OPVs, organic solar cells, OSCs).[1,2] After summarizing this work, I will then outline our very recent results where we took BsubPc based planar heterojunction organic photovoltaic cells and put them on the roof of our building in downtown Toronto during the summers of 2015 and 2016 in the ambient environment. What we found was that when BsubPcs are applied as electron accepting materials they are remarkably stable and maintain a 4% PCE over time. On the flipside, when applied as electron donating materials the stability of the paired material, C60, fullerene, dictates the overall stability of the devices. Additionally we have used a novel method to map out the degradation pathway of the OPVs which will be described. We were able to ultimately form a structure property relationship to their stability in the ambient environment. In parallel we have also been exploring the concept of complementary absorption engineering by either the chemical modification of BsubPcs or by pairing BsubPcs with alternative materials having complementary absorption profiles. For example, we have recently shown that after firming up the chemical structure of phosphorus oxy tetrabenzotriazacorrole [POTbc, a phthalocyanine analogue] that the pairing of a BsubPc with yields a unique gray organic photovoltaic cell absorbing broadly across the visible spectrum. Our group’s has recently began the exploration of the bulk-heterojunction OPV space whereby BsubPcs are again electron accepting fullerene alternatives, although we are not the first to do so.[3,4] I will articulate our recent findings. We have also recently shown that structural analogs to BsubPcs, boron subnaphthalocyanines (BsubNcs) are actually a mixed alloy composition of chlorinated materials designated as Cl-ClnBsubNcs. After establishing the correlation of electrochemical characteristics and OPV performance for Cl-ClnBsubNc we have recently shown how phenoxylated versions of ClnBsubNc are also applicable in BHJ OPVs also as electron accepting materials. We have also explored the potential of chemistry variations to yield pure examples of BsubNcs. Time permitting this will be outlined along with electrochemical characterization. Finally, during last year’s meeting, I outlined how our group’s recent exploration of other p-block metal phthalocyanines (Pcs) yielded the conclusion that silicon phthalocyanines (SiPcs) can also be applied as fullerene alternatives/acceptors in organic photovoltaic cells. Our conclusion at the time was that phenoxylation enhances the performance of SiPcs as an electron transporting/accepting materials. Over the past year we have enhanced this conclusion and formed an initial structure property relationship that gives a road map to synthetic alternatives of SiPcs that may ultimately yield higher performing OPVs. The potential applications have also been expanded beyond SiPcs in PHJ OPVs whereby we have shown that they can be equally applied as electron accepting fullerene alternatives in the BHJ OPV space as well. I will outline this structure property relationship and our future work in this area. Coauthors and coinvestigators will be cited as appropriate throughout the presentation. References: [1] Cnops, K.; et al., Nature Comm., 5, Article number: 3406, doi:10.1038/ncomms4406. [2] Verreet, B.; et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 1301413, doi:10.1002/aenm.201301413. [2] Ebenhoch, B.; et al., J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 7345. [3] Duan, C.; et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, DOI: 10.1002/anie.201608644. Our Relevant References: “Outdoor Performance and Stability of Boron Subphthalocyanines Applied as Electron Acceptors in Fullerene-Free Organic Photovoltaics.” Josey, D.; et al, submitted. “The mixed and alloyed chemical composition of chloro-(chloro)n-boronsubnaphthalocyanines dictates their physical properties and performance in organic photovoltaics.” Dang, J.D.*; Josey, D.*; Lough, A.; Li, Y.; Sifate, A.*; Lu, Z.H.; Bender, T.P.; J. Mat. Chem. A., 2016, 4, 9566-9577. “Acceptor Properties of Boron Subphthalocyanines in Fullerene Free Photovoltaics.” Beaumont, N.; Castrucci, J.S.; Sullivan, P.; Morse, G.E.; Paton, A.S.; Lu, Z.H.; Bender, T.P.*; Jones, T.S.; J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118(27) 14813–14823. “The Position and Frequency of Fluorine Atoms Changes the Electron Donor/Acceptor Properties of Fluorophenoxy Silicon Phthalocyanines within Organic Photovoltaic Devices” Lessard, B.H.; Grant. T.; White, R.; Thibau, E.; Lu, Z-H.; Bender, T.P.*; J. Mater. Chem. C., 2015, 24512-24524.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine ChemistryFrench-language works237,207