Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente les réflexions sur sa religion d’un pasteur abénaquis, Peter Paul Osunkhirhine, qui a exercé à Saint-François, ancienne mission jésuite de la vallée du Saint-Laurent, auxixesiècle. En prenant deux de ses lettres comme exemples, on constate qu’il participe activement aux débats de la société qui l’entoure et qu’il cherche à jouer un rôle de penseur au sein de la communauté, voire de la congrégation à laquelle il appartient. Auteur de plusieurs écrits, il n’hésite pas à confronter ses idées à celles du Révérend Burns, presbytérien, membre éminent de l’Église de Knox. À travers ce personnage, c’est le rôle actif de plusieurs Amérindiens de cette époque dans les changements vécus par leur communauté qui transparaît : oeuvrant dans un milieu plutôt hostile, Osunkhirhine montre qu’il s’est véritablement approprié les idées véhiculées par le protestantisme pour les adapter à sa situation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".