Ressources universitaires et travailleurs syndiqués : l’expérience d’un programme conjoint université-syndicats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article décrit un programme de formation et de recherche mené conjointement par l’Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), la Confédération des syndicats nationaux (CSN) et la Fédération des travailleurs du Québec (FTQ). Après avoir expliqué les origines du projet, l’auteur décrit les principales caractéristiques de ce programme, lequel repose sur une adaptation des ressources universitaires aux besoins de recherche ou de formation du mouvement syndical, dans le cadre de démarches initiées et contrôlées par lui. Par la suite, l’auteur analyse certains acquis et difficultés de ce programme : des activités de formation qui respectent la démarche syndicale mais un problème pédagogique d’adaptation des ressources universitaires, des activités de recherche orientée originales et utiles mais dont la diffusion dans certains cas demeure insuffisante, la reconnaissance graduelle mais lente de la nécessité, de la légitimité et de la spécificité de l’intervention universitaire en promotion collective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".