Asymptotic estimates of the convergence of classical Schwarz waveform relaxation domain decomposition methods for two-dimensional stationary quantum waves
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is devoted to the analysis of convergence of Schwarz Waveform Relaxation (SWR) domain decomposition methods (DDM) for solving the stationary linear and nonlinear Schrödinger equations by the imaginary-time method. Although SWR are extensively used for numerically solving high-dimensional quantum and classical wave equations, the analysis of convergence and of the rate of convergence is still largely open for linear equations with variable coefficients and nonlinear equations. The aim of this paper is to tackle this problem for both the linear and nonlinear Schrödinger equations in the two-dimensional setting. By extending ideas and concepts presented earlier [X. Antoine and E. Lorin,Numer. Math.137(2017) 923–958] and by using pseudodifferential calculus, we prove the convergence and determine some approximate rates of convergence of the two-dimensional Classical SWR method for two subdomains with smooth boundary. Some numerical experiments are also proposed to validate the analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".