Asymptotic estimates of the convergence of classical Schwarz waveform relaxation domain decomposition methods for two-dimensional stationary quantum waves
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is devoted to the analysis of convergence of Schwarz Waveform Relaxation (SWR) domain decomposition methods (DDM) for solving the stationary linear and nonlinear Schrödinger equations by the imaginary-time method. Although SWR are extensively used for numerically solving high-dimensional quantum and classical wave equations, the analysis of convergence and of the rate of convergence is still largely open for linear equations with variable coefficients and nonlinear equations. The aim of this paper is to tackle this problem for both the linear and nonlinear Schrödinger equations in the two-dimensional setting. By extending ideas and concepts presented earlier [X. Antoine and E. Lorin, Numer. Math. 137 (2017) 923–958] and by using pseudodifferential calculus, we prove the convergence and determine some approximate rates of convergence of the two-dimensional Classical SWR method for two subdomains with smooth boundary. Some numerical experiments are also proposed to validate the analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it