Compte rendu du séminaire annuel de l’international association of security & investigative regulators (IASIR) tenu à Las Vegas les 26-28 octobre 2016
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pour la deuxième année consécutive, le Conseil national des activités privées de sécurité (CNAPS) a participé au séminaire annuel de l’ International Association of Security & Investigative Regulators (IASIR), organisé du 26 au 28 octobre 2016 à Las Vegas (Etats-Unis) – le CNAPS est devenu membre, à cette occasion, de l’IASIR. Le thème de ce séminaire portait sur les réponses et l’adaptation de la sécurité privée et de ses régulateurs à la menace terroriste : « Tuning private security and investigations to the terror frequency. How regulators can calibrate policies to mitigate exposures ? ». Il s’agit, ici, de tracer un bref compte rendu descriptif de ce séminaire, plus précisément de ses éléments relatifs à la sécurité privée 1 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".