MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612224301 · doi:10.1109/icit.2017.7915432

Taylor series approximation of ZIP model for on-line estimation of residential loads' parameters

2017· article· en· W2612224301 on OpenAlexafffund
Adalgiza del Pilar Rios, Kodjo Agbossou, Alben Cardenas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTaylor seriesVoltageSeries (stratigraphy)AC powerLine (geometry)Representation (politics)Electric power systemComputer sciencePolynomialControl theory (sociology)Range (aeronautics)Power (physics)Voltage optimisationEstimation theoryMathematical optimizationMathematicsAlgorithmEngineeringArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electric models of loads are typically obtained from power measurements by imposing voltage variations within a large range beyond the recommended limits of normal operation. This traditional approach gives good results but is not adapted for the estimation of models' parameters while the load is fed by the utility voltage. This paper proposes a novel approach of static model based on the Polynomial (ZIP) model; the proposed approach uses Taylor series approximation (TSA) to represent the active and reactive power close to the nominal value of the utility voltage. This model allows the representation of the power consumption through the real voltage variations of the electrical system and permits the on-line estimation of the loads' parameters. Simulation and experimental results using common loads are provided confirming the advantages of the proposed method compared to the classic approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207