Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the effect of Jordanian household circumstances on child health. The main objective is to figure out the extent to which household circumstances matter for child survival and health of surviving children. Repeated cross sectional micro-data from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) for Jordan spanning the period 1997–2009 is used. Logit models and standard linear regression models are employed in the analysis. Main findings may be summarized as follows. Household conditions appear to matter for child survival odds and health of surviving children. Boys’ survival odds ratio is about quarter to one-third less than girls. However, surviving boys are on average taller than girls. Chances of surviving increases with child birth order, whereas birth order is negatively associated with height of survivors. Education of the mother enhances the chances of child surviving by 60-120%, and increases the child height. Given age, effects of mother education is more significant for boys compared to girls. Physician care during conception is positively associated with the health of survivors. Ownership of refrigerator is positively associated with child height. Finally, children in urban areas show better health compared to their counterparts in rural areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".