MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612271016 · doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4539-5

CCCS-SSAI WikiRecs clinical practice guideline: vasopressor blood pressure targets in critically ill adults with hypotension and vasopressor use in early traumatic shock

2017· letter· en· W2612271016 on OpenAlexaff
Bram Rochwerg, Mathieu Hylands, Morten Hylander Møller, Pierre Asfar, Dian Cohen, Rachel G. Khadaroo, Jon Henrik Laake, Anders Perner, Teddie Tanguay, Sandy Widder, Per Olav Vandvik, A Kristiansen, François Lamontagne

Bibliographic record

VenueIntensive Care Medicine · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversity of AlbertaUniversité de SherbrookeCanadian Nurses AssociationMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnesthesiologyGuidelineShock (circulatory)Critically illIntensive care medicinePain medicineBlood pressureHemorrhagic shockAnesthesiaIntensive careCritical illnessResuscitationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.064
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.064
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueIntensive Care MedicineSame topicHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyFrench-language works237,207