MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612308316

Lithium markets experience bumpy start to 2014

2014· article· en· W2612308316 on OpenAlex
E. D. Hughes

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Minerals · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Cash flowFive year planAgricultural economicsBusinessOperations managementEngineeringFinanceGeographyEconomicsChinaArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During 2013, Galaxy's Jiangsu project produced 5,844 tonnes lithium carbonate and 1,360 tonnes in Q4. The company's Jiangsu plant also received its first shipment of feedstock from Talison Lithium in early December and production resumed in mid-December. This impacted the strategic plan of Jiangsu reaching cash flow break-even status during the quarter. However individual run rate periods once Jiangsu was re-commissioned were encouraging and as such Galaxy expects to now reach cash flow break even status at Jiangsu within the first quarter of 2014, it added. In doing so, monthly costs have been reduced from between A$250,000 and A$300,000/month to a steady state of less than A$100,000/month. Redundancies were paid in December, while camp, pilot plant and office closures will be finalised in the current quarter, Galaxy outlined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it