Perspectivas de la Educación Contable: Desafíos para el reconocimiento de los espacios socioambientales en los programas de Contaduría Pública en la ciudad de Medellín.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo pretende analizar la contribución de la educación contable en los estudiantes de Contaduría Pública de la ciudad de Medellín, con el fin de reconocer los espacios socio-ambientales en los que habitan y se desarrollan personal y profesionalmente. Para esto, se presenta una conceptualización sobre el término espacio socio-ambiental; se realiza una caracterización desde los contenidos curriculares, los perfiles profesionales y las líneas de investigación, con el propósito de exponer sus aproximaciones socio-ambientales. Finalmente, se exponen y analizan algunas ideas sobre el aporte académico y sentires de los estudiantes de Contaduría Pública en la discusión socio-ambiental en Colombia, particularmente en la ciudad de Medellín donde se realiza el estudio. Palabras clave: educación y formación contable, espacios socio-ambientales, currículo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".