MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612310626 · doi:10.11575/prism/26731

Late Pennsylvanian-Early Permian Stratigraphy, Sedimentology and Paleoceanography of the Sverdrup Basin, NW Ellesmere Island, Arctic Canada

2016· dissertation· en· W2612310626 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel Calvo Gonzalez

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSverdrupSedimentologyGeologyPaleoceanographyPennsylvanianArcticStratigraphyPaleontologyPermianOceanographyStructural basinOoidPermafrostStructural geologyTectonicsFacies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Pennsylvanian-Early Permian carbonate succession of the Sverdrup Basin was studied in Otto Fiord, northwest Ellesmere Island. Seven sections containing shelf carbonates and slope mudrocks and chert were analyzed. The Gzhelian-Kungurian sequence stratigraphy of the basin was revisited based on microfacies analysis and field observations performed in these sections. Two new unconformity-bounded T-R sequences were defined: 1) Sakmarian: composed of the Raanes and contemporaneous Hare Fiord formations; and 2) Artinskian: formed by the Trappers Cove and the bulk of the Great Bear Cape formations. Furthermore, the warm- to cool-water transition in carbonate sedimentation in the basin was analyzed. Based on microfacies analysis of samples from the Nansen and Raanes formations the origin and timing of this shift in sedimentation was discussed. Global warming-enhanced upwelling in Panthalassa is here suggested to be the trigger for this transition. This global warming marks the end of the Late Palaeozoic Ice Age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.917

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.155
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207