Stimulus-Responsive Degradable Polylactide-Based Block Copolymer Nanoassemblies for Controlled/Enhanced Drug Delivery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polylactide (PLA) is biocompatible and FDA-approved for clinical use and thus has been a choice of the materials valuable for extensive applications in biomedical fields. However, conventionally designed PLA-based amphiphilic block copolymer (ABP) nanoassemblies exhibit slow and uncontrolled release of encapsulated drugs because of the slow biodegradation of hydrophobic PLA in physiological conditions. To improve potentials for clinical use and commercialization of conventional PLA-based nanoassemblies, stimulus-responsive degradation (SRD) platform has been introduced into the design of PLA-based nanoassemblies for enhanced/controlled release of encapsulated drugs. This review summarizes recent strategies that allow for the development of PLA-based ABPs and their self-assembled nanostructures exhibiting SRD-induced enhanced drug release. The review focuses on the design, synthesis, and evaluation of the nanoassemblies as intracellular drug delivery nanocarriers for cancer therapy. Further, the outlook is briefly discussed on the important aspects for the current and future development of more effective SRD PLA-based nanoassemblies toward tumor-targeting intracellular drug delivery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it