MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612395382

Deterministic finite element solution of unsteady flow and transport through porous media: model development

2005· article· en· W2612395382 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. G. Aguirre, A. Madani, R. Mohtar And K. Haghighi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodPorous mediumFlow (mathematics)Boundary value problemMechanicsApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationMathematicsGeotechnical engineeringComputer sciencePorosityMathematical analysisEngineeringPhysicsStructural engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aguirre, C.G., Madani, A., Mohtar, R. and Haghighi, K. 2005. Deterministic finite element solution of unsteady flow and transport through porous media: Model development. Canadian Biosystems Engineering/Le genie des biosystemes au Canada 47: 1.291.35. A deterministic finite element solution to predict water flow and nutrient movement through porous media was developed and implemented using Visual C++. The model is user-friendly, can be used as a management tool, and is able to predict the NO3-N losses in subsurface drainage water. The application of either solid or liquid fertilizer can be easily simulated. To reduce computational time, mathematical expressions for the contributions of the flux boundary conditions to the finite element equations were developed analytically and directly introduced into the force vectors. The global system of equations was evaluated using a finite difference approximation in the time domain. The finite element methodology provides a very attractive approach to predict flow and transport of nutrients in soils.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207