MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612400171 · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2017.0059

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 1.2017

2017· article· en· W2612400171 on OpenAlexaff
Al B. Benson, Michael I. D’Angelica, Daniel E. Abbott, Thomas A. Abrams, Steven R. Alberts, Daniel A. Anaya, Chandrakanth Are, Daniel B. Brown, Daniel T. Chang, Anne M. Covey, William G. Hawkins, Renuka Iyer, Rojymon Jacob, Andrea Karachristos, Robin Kate Kelley, Robin D. Kim, Manisha Palta, James O. Park, Vaibhav Sahai, Tracey E. Schefter, Carl Schmidt, Jason K. Sicklick, Gagandeep Singh, Davendra Sohal, Stacey Stein, Guo Tian, Jean‐Nicolas Vauthey, Alan P. Venook, Andrew X. Zhu, K Hoffmann, Susan Darlow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesKyowa Hakko KirinAdvanced Accelerator ApplicationsJazz PharmaceuticalsCook MedicalBoston Scientific CorporationNational Cancer InstituteSirtex MedicalGenomic HealthClovis OncologyVarian Medical SystemsNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationAstraZenecaCelgeneGilead SciencesAstellas PharmaNovocureCelldex TherapeuticsAmgen
KeywordsMedicineHepatocellular carcinomaGallbladderGallbladder cancerGeneral surgeryInternal medicineIntensive care medicineOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The NCCN Guidelines for Hepatobiliary Cancers provide treatment recommendations for cancers of the liver, gallbladder, and bile ducts. The NCCN Hepatobiliary Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's discussion and most recent recommendations regarding locoregional therapy for treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.095
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.095
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.210
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations351
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkSame topicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisFrench-language works237,207