Bibliographic record
Abstract
La problématique marxiste a révélé son incontestable supériorité en ethnologie économique avant de s’effondrer pour des motifs fort éloignés de l’activité scientifique. Comme aucune autre approche n’a pu la remplacer de façon convenable, l’ethnologie économique elle-même se retrouve sinistrée. Il est grand temps de revenir à la méthode d’analyse des modes de production, en profitant de ce qu’elle a cessé de supporter des joutes scolastiques, l’objectif étant de chercher comment elle peut être utile à la sociologie comparative, et non plus l’inverse. Entre procès de travail concurrents et dualités des modes de production, l’étage des procès de production a été négligé, bien qu’il conditionne l’interdisciplinarité, notamment avec la technologie culturelle et l’écologie humaine. La complémentarité de deux sources d’illustrations est ici mise à profit : les Corbières viticoles (Languedoc) et la forêt centrafricaine près de la Lobaye.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.051 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".