Les visites sensorielles, une autre façon d’appréhender l’art
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Québec, le musée d’art contemporain des Laurentides et la salle Alfred-Pellan de la Maison des arts de Laval ont mené des réflexions, en matière d’art contemporain, sur les approches de médiation les plus adaptées et le rôle du médiateur en fonction des contextes d’exposition. En 2015, elles se sont étendues au contexte international, à travers la Biennale de Venise. Cet article analyse les points de comparaison entre les expertises de médiation culturelle italienne et québécoise (interactions, partage de réflexions, etc.). Il s’attache à explorer le rôle du médiateur et la place du visiteur dans le cadre de ce grand événement de tourisme culturel. Comment les publics sont-ils accompagnés afin de favoriser leur expérience de groupe ? Y a-t-il des approches et des outils de médiation à privilégier pour répondre à leurs attentes ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.042 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".