Bibliographic record
Abstract
Volume 23 begins a new stage in Baha'i Studies regarding the Association and the Journal. Inspired by the Universal House of Justice letter of 24 July 2013, the Editorial Committee has decided, first of all, to increase the frequency of the journal to more than the current publication rate of one issue per year. This issue will thus be the last one representing an entire volume-a year's worth of articles (2013).A second change-a full-time editor with a new editorial committee- will result in a faster turn-around time for submissions. All papers will be immediately triaged to assess their viability, and authors will be given feedback at every step of the editorial process. The entire procedure will be extremely efficient. Because the Journal is the editor's full-time job, submissions, suggestions, and queries will be answered promptly.Third, as noted in the ABS Bulletin, many issues will be theme-based. This does not mean that an article of merit need await publication until an issue related to the subject of the piece is scheduled; an article will be published as soon as possible after it is peer-reviewed and edited. But the theme orientation does mean that most issues will have a coherence that the Editorial Committee hopes the readership will find helpful in exploring matters of pressing concern to the Baha'i community and to discourse in the wider community of interest.In this context, the Journal will try to establish an ongoing exchange by encouraging readers and contributors alike to offer suggested topics and themes of interest and by encouraging scholars from various disciplines to contact the Editorial Committee with proposals for articles. Such processes will increase the outreach of the Journal without in any way diminishing or compromising the caliber of the scholarship itself.Another change that the Editorial Committee will implement is to place future book reviews on the ABS Website rather than publishing them in the Journal. This change will allow for a more a timely assessment of new books and allow for a greater number of works to be reviewed. Furthermore, if the reviews are published online, more space in the costly printed issue of the Journal can then be allotted to articles.Naturally, feedback from the readership on this and other decisions will be taken into account. Please address comments to Editor, Journal of Bahai Studies (editor@bahai-studies.ca). The new introductory section From the Editor's Desk will serve to provide an opportunity to share with readers these observations and the Editorial Committee's response to them. From the Editor's Desk will also serve to ask for feedback on other important matters concerning the Journal, and, most important, it will provide an overview of the thematic structure of each particular number.All previous standards regarding peer review and relevance of submissions to specific fields of study and to the Faith still apply (details at: https:// www.bahai-studies.ca/ journal / submissions). In addition, the Editorial Committee welcomes submissions for cover art and hopes readers will find the somewhat more bold color of the journal and its variety of cover art enjoyable and inspiring. Furthermore, the Editorial Committee calls on those who wish to be considered as possible peer reviewers to send a brief CV to the Editor. The Editorial Committee is happy to consider using such services in helping the Journal respond to the rapidly increasing need for Bahai scholars to participate in the vital discourses affecting this critical turning point in human history.The First Century of the Formative AgeAs we begin this new stage in the evolution of the Journal of Bahai Studies, we are extremely fortunate to include articles by former Universal House of Justice member Mr. Douglas Martin and House of Justice member Mr. Paul Lample, the well-received Balyuzi lecture by Dr. Shapour Rassekh, and book reviews by Yale Professor Emeritus Firuz Kazemzadeh, by lawyer, author, and former Bahai World Centre staff member, Mrs. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".