Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resistant starches (RSs) are food ingredient sources of fiber. Their fiber content is measured in vitro, which may not accurately reflect in vivo digestibility. Carbohydrate content of commercial starches (Hi-Maize® 260 [HM], Hylon® VII [HY] and Amioca [AM]) was determined in vivo. Fiber values for HM, HY and AM were: 32.8 g, 11.5 g and 0 g in vitro, 12.5 g, 40.8 g and 6.2 g from blood glucose study (n=10) and 18.7 g, 21.6 g and 1.7 g from ileostomy study (n=3). 13.4% and 43.5% of RS in HM and HY was recovered in effluent. Total bacterial count (TBC) was 10^9 CFU/ g of effluent and positive correlation (r=0.4955) existed between TBC and carbohydrates by difference for HM and HY. The in vitro AOAC 991.43 method underestimates fiber content in HY and AM and overestimates fiber content in HM and does not accurately reflect fiber content of RS products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".